Knowledge Base Repository
In addition to research papers, the Design Society is developing several valuable resources for those interested in the study of design. These include a repository of PhD theses, a library of case studies and transcripts of design activities, and an archive of our newsletters. Please note that these resources are accessible exclusively to Design Society members.
METHODOLOGY FOR CHOOSING LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT SECTOR-SPECIFIC INDICATORS
Chevalier, Bruno; Reyes, Tatiana; Laratte, Bertrand
Type:
Year:
2011
Editor:
Culley, S.J.; Hicks, B.J.; McAloone, T.C.; Howard, T.J. & Malmqvist, J.
Author:
Series:
ICED
Section:
Design for X, Design to X
Page(s):
312-323
Abstract:
There is a wide range of indicators available for use in Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA). For designers with limited experience of Life Cycle Assessment, it is difficult to decide which is the most likely to lead to a more environmentally friendly product. In industry, and in SMEs in particular, designers lacking the expertise needed to use LCA in an eco-design approach are liable to pay insufficient attention to indicator selection and may use inappropriate indicators that result in design faults. The lack of sector-specific methodological guidelines to assist them is another similar cause of problems. This article describes the methodology of choice for selecting the most appropriate impact categories and characterisation models for a LCIA in order to facilitate the choice of eco-design solutions. The two main stages of the methodology are described and explained. This procedure can be used directly by individuals carrying out an LCA or by developers of specialised LCA tools that choose indicators for the user. This methodology will make the LCA technique more accessible and better suited to designers' needs and so help encourage wider acceptance of the eco-design approach.
Keywords:
