Join Now!

Join our welcoming International Design Community.

Read about the many benefits of becoming and remaining a member.

Full, Associate, Departmental and Institutional Membership available.

Complete this application form to join now.

Design Science Journal
Papers

UNDERSTANDING GROUP DESIGN BEHAVIOUR IN ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION

UNDERSTANDING GROUP DESIGN BEHAVIOUR IN ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION

Year: 2017

Section: Design Education Practice

Editor: Berg, Arild; Bohemia, Erik; Buck, Lyndon; Gulden, Tore; Kovacevic, Ahmed; Pavel, Nenad

Author: Morgan, Thea; McMahon, Chris

Series: E&PDE

Institution: University of Bristol, United Kingdom

Section: Design Education Practice

Pages: 056-061

ISBN: 978-1-904670-84-1

Abstract

Observations in industry show that engineers’ perceptions of design activity tend towards positivistic, rational problem-solving, which is at odds with the nuanced, situated, constructivist nature of observed design behaviour. This paradigmatic mismatch appears to inhibit the ability of engineers to reflect ‘on’ reflecting ‘in’ action, and is apparently formed during engineering design education which, within the UK and commonly elsewhere, is heavily influenced by a positivistic ‘engineering science’ doctrine. In this research natural group design behaviour in engineering design education was explored through detailed observation of undergraduate group-project activity. An analytic framework was formed by three sensitising concepts: design as the resolution of paradoxes, designerly ways of knowing, and design as talk. Key findings conceptualise natural design activity in this setting as a form of constructivist inquiry akin to case study research. Five core activity themes emerged; collecting data, analyzing and interpreting data, identifying themes, theory-building and testing, and telling the story. Students engaged spontaneously in these core activities. Findings were sense-checked from an
ontological and epistemological viewpoint, and found to be well-grounded if design is considered from a complexity perspective. Implications are that a radically different pedagogy may be appropriate for engineering design education. Students could significantly benefit from understanding their own design activity as constructivist inquiry, rather than rational problem-solving. Set within a broader
education in the ‘philosophy of design’, rooted in a complexity paradigm, students could be better enabled to reflect on their own experiential learning of design. Thus resolving the paradigmatic conflict between perception and practice.

Keywords: Design Paradigm, Design Behaviour, Design Pedagogy

Buy NowBuy Now

Member price: 0.00 GBP (Join Now)
Full price: 3.00 GBP

Shopping Cart
ds conference19th International Conference on Engineering & Product Design Education, E&PDE 2017, Oslo, Norway, 7th - 8th September 2017

19th International Conference on Engineering & Product Design Education, E&PDE 2017, Oslo, Norway, 7th - 8th September 2017http://epde.info/epde2017/about-epde The 19th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education will be hosted by HiOA from Oslo (http://www.hioa.no/). The conference is organised in partnership with the Design Education Special Interest Group (DESIG) of the Design Society, and the Institution of Engineering Designers (IED, http://www.institution-engineering-designers.org.uk/) . The E&PDE conference will bring together representatives from education and industry who...

Read More

Special Interest Group (SIG)Design Education

Design EducationTo bring together academics, designers, training professionals and others throughout the world who have an interest in design education at the tertiary level....

Read More

Join Now!

Join our welcoming International Design Community.

Read about the many benefits of becoming and remaining a member.

Full, Associate, Departmental and Institutional Membership available.

Complete this application form to join now.

Keywords
SIG Workshop - March 2013